Cameroon Is Not Going Back On The Green Tree Accord With Nigeria Over The Bakassi Peninsula

Cameroon Is Not Going Back On The Green Tree Accord With Nigeria Over The Bakassi Peninsula Co-habitation between Cameroonians...


Cameroon Is Not Going Back On The Green Tree Accord With Nigeria Over The Bakassi Peninsula

Co-habitation between Cameroonians and Nigerians in the Bakassi peninsula has since 2006 been guided by an international treaty which leaders of the two countries unanimously signed to respect the verdict of the International Court of Justice. 
In effect, the June 12, 2006 Greentree Accord, as the promise was christened, signed in New York between the then Nigerian Head of State, Olusegun Obasanjo, and Cameroon’s President Paul Biya in the presence of the then UN Secretary General, Kofi Atta Annan reaffirmed the willingness of the two countries to peacefully implement the October 10, 2002 ruling of the International Court of Justice which gave sovereignty to Cameroon over the hitherto disputed land and maritime Bakassi peninsula.  
By the agreement, Nigeria recognised the authority of Cameroon over the Bakassi Peninsula and thus timeframes were set – 60 days from the date of signing the accord, for the removal of all Nigerian armed forces from the area. 
This was in a spirit of goodwill necessary for better prospects for cooperation between the two countries after years of not-so-friendly bilateral ties. This was also for the wellbeing of the two peoples and socio-political stability in the region. Reason why after the transfer of authority over Bakassi to Cameroon by Nigeria, Cameroon had to guarantee the fundamental rights and freedoms of Nigerian nationals living in the Bakassi Peninsula as contained in international human rights laws and in other relevant provisions of international law.


Article 3 (2) of the Greentree Accord particularly stipulates that, “Cameroon shall:  not force Nigerian nationals living in the Bakassi Peninsula to leave the zone or to change their nationality, respect their culture, language and beliefs, respect their right to continue their agricultural and fishing activities, protect their property and their customary land rights, not levy in any discriminatory manner any taxes and other dues on Nigerian nationals living in the zone, and take every necessary measure to protect Nigerian nationals living in the zone from any harassment or harm.”

To say the least, these are rights of Nigerians who after the ICJ ruling chose to remain in Cameroonian soil (Bakassi Peninsula). These rights have been respected to the letter. However, logic teaches us all that rights go with responsibilities. 
After benefitting from all these, Nigerian citizens who decided to continue in a foreign territory needed not to be reminded of their responsibilities to comply with the rules and regulations in force. Having their resident papers and living up to expectations with customs and taxation royalties are simply the minimum. Nigeria and Cameroon are States of law and he/she who chooses to reside anywhere has the moral and legal obligation to respect the administrative and legal instruments in place.

That some misguided Nigerians showed blatant hostility characterised by brutality on members of the tax collection committee deployed on the field  by the Idabato council authorities,  threatening to destroy various public and private buildings on grounds that they were on Nigerian territory, is regrettably a travesty of justice. There can’t be any renege on the Greentree Accord that has guided relationship between the two peoples for dozens of years today. The politics of reason, craving for peace and dialogue in conflict resolution which stood against all odds cannot be tampered with now.
Courtesy Cameroon Tribune

Related

Politics 1208336289559619274

Post a Comment

emo-but-icon

Recent Comments

Comments By: Oudney's Studios
item